Had one of their attorneys for a comp case. The attorneys refused to enter into evidence proof the employer committed insurance fraud as defined by law, forgery as defined by law, already found to have deceived the court previously in the available transcripts, a professional misconduct that was already determined by the state on one of their witnesses,the attorney wanted to argue evidence that was never submitted into evidence by the attorney as required. Also the alleged IME was working for the employer in his deposition admitted by the employer counsel. As their witness was not independent, id propose purgury. I actually sent an email to this law firm about the conduct. More that was clearly questionable conduct.
My question is, who do they work for? I was paying them to work for my person but every time I turned around they were defending the person or company from the facts that would have won my case years ago. Their evidence should have been determined inadmissible based on the misconduct by itself. They can't sue my person due to the facts are true and correct .