Home > Attorney in Eugene, OR > Attorney Brad Litchfield Review

Attorney Brad Litchfield

Attorney in Eugene, OR
Reviews: 5 | Overal Rating: Good
Excellect
4
Good
0
Average
0
Bad
0
Awful
1
Thursday 8AM–5:30PM
Friday 8AM–5:30PM
Saturday Closed
Sunday Closed
Monday 8AM–5:30PM
Tuesday 8AM–5:30PM
Wednesday 8AM–5:30PM

Reviews

Review Left On 02/23/2020
Steve Sleeper

Brad is one of the kindest more empathetic people I know. he cares deeply our his client's and their families. Kids come first with Brad. He has an outstanding knowledge of the law and is a good person.
Review Left On 03/28/2019
Rob Harris

GREAT advice and guidance
Review Left On 02/28/2018
Tamil Beach

If I could give 10 stars out of five, I would. I was involved in a civil case in which my 15 year old son was expected to testify. My son was very nervous about this and so was I. Brad Litchfield accepted the case and we feel so fortunate to have been in his care. I feel certain my case was not the most important matter in his caseload, but he always made me and my son feel as though it was. It was a great pleasure to meet him and to see how professionally and empathetically he handled our case. He is clearly a caring and compassionate person and was respectful to everyone involved. Importantly, I appreciate that he at all times made my son feel informed, at ease, safe, and cared for. And, of course, he won our case!
Review Left On 02/28/2018
ryan thompson

Bradley is a great man and a great attorney. He helped me so much through my journey and helped make things right! He was above and beyond everything I expected and made me feel like family. I would recommend Brad to anyone going through a hardship who needs professional help!
Review Left On 02/28/2016
lisa stein

I spent $10,000 while brad Litchfield investigated "what happened".
And then , at his suggestion and my expense, he hired an "expert" for
$5000 and an investigator for 4 more thousand. $25,000 later , the
lawyer I ended up with told me in 2 minutes, that "what happened" is
not even permissible in court, only whether or not I am an employer.
So all that "investigating was a little prematture. And in fact,was never used. Brad must have figured that out at some point
because he never even listened to the tapes from the investigator.
( at least I didn't see it in the list of what he did in the bills)

When I called Brad asking him if it s true that workers comp had
paid the claimant- Jeff- money, instead of calling workers comp to
find out, he called the claimants lawyer who misinformed him and he
then he misinformed me.
Brad had me also hire Zack as an expert on workers claim. I ended
up spending a bunch of money as they conferred with each other. I
thought it was a little crazy and brad told me that no one specializes
in both, that I really have to pay "double, essentially- as they
conferred with each other, both came to meetings to tell me what was
going on, etc. and I had to have both of them cause they each had
different information. Another thing I do not think was true. But I
felt a little captivated because they knew so much. Little did I know
that most of what " they knew" was irrelevant.

At least 4 times, I told him that even tho the claimant's lawyer
told him something , I still believed that claimantthe hadn't gotten any
money and asked him to check. At least 4 times he said he would and
didn't.

Then, Brad and Zack spent more money and came up with what they
called the "donut hole". Which essentially means, I believe, that if I
can settle before workers comp pays out, they they do not need to be
involved. After already asking 3 times, brad said "both Zack and I
will call the next working day." I don't know if Zack did , but Brad
certainly did not. Zack called and said he never heard back. But
when my mom called, they called her back the next day . And when I
called , they also called me the next day. I finally got the
information I had been asking the lawyers when after asking for months
, I finally called and got the information I needed in less than 24
hours from the time I decided to find out. But it was too late by
then.

I also asked repeatedly if "facts matter" because I spent hours
piecing the information together. They don't and I never found that
out until my newest lawyer, bill told me. In the meantime., Brad sent
the information I pieced together to see if the "expert" agreed. He
did and charged me another $500. Not that it matters. ( as well, of
course of the price of sending the info ,reading the response and
forwarding it to me.

When Brad talked to the claimant's lawyer, he gave him a couple of money amounts that I would be responsible for. I asked him what those
amounts meant . After asking a few times , he said he didn't know.
Or maybe that was Zack. Anyway, no one knew.
Brad made a date to have a mediation, with the claimant's lawyer,
the claimant's lawyer gave a beginning settlement amount that was
astounding. I said I didn't know if I would walk into a mediation
starting at that amount. Brad shared that with the lawyer who said
essentially, don't worry. And he passed that onto me When my new
lawyer, bill came on., within a week, he called the claimant's lawyer
and they agreed to a lower beginning price. He said he was having a
little extra problem because Zack didn't write a "contest" correctly,
which was hindering a bit.

So I spent over $30,000 and a year before I quit with Brad litchfield and Zack Mittge. My new lawyer is about one third, and in a few months settled the case for less than half of what these guys were suggesting,

Leave A Review For For Attorney Brad Litchfield


Useful Links